8 | P a g e
pertinent regulatory data using a Scaled Inspection Tool (SIT) to provide an
indication of the level of risk to service users within care homes. The
concomitant and overarching aim was to apply a mathematical scoring system
based on this analysis of risk, coupled with dynamic data modelling which would
be used to develop a planned inspection schedule.
This research endeavoured to develop the evidential base upon which RQIA
may focus and improve the regulatory acuity of individual inspectors as they
seek to drive improvement and identify risks to patients. Specifically, this
research aimed at critically examining the experiences, and by extension,
perspectives, feelings and behaviours of inspectors working within the CHT as
these relate to their understanding of the RADaR framework and their specific
use of the RADaR SIT.
The research project also considered any emerging patterns among the
experiences and/or behaviours of inspectors as they engage with and make use
of the RADaR SIT while they seek to make informed, targeted and effective
regulatory decisions. The project also looked at these patterns and considered
what they may signify in terms of the positive or negative cultural milieu of RQIA
and any organisational barriers that may need to be addressed.
Methodology and Methods
This research study involved a qualitative exploration of the experiences of 14
inspectors working within the RQIA Care Home's Team. Specifically, it focused
upon their experiences as they relate to their use of the RADaR SIT.
The method of data collection which was adopted by the researcher involved the
use of a single semi-structured open-ended interview which was conducted with
each inspector online using MS Teams. The interviews focused on the
participants' experiences in regard to using the RADaR SIT. The interview also
included a short vignette which was provided to the inspector prior to the
interview and which they were asked to review and complete an SIT score for.
Findings
The researcher initially identified 16 inspectors who met the inclusion criteria for
participating within the study; however, only 14 inspectors (87.5%) took part due
to one inspector leaving the organisation prior to the study commencing and
another inspector requiring a period of extended leave while the semi-structured